More Business Process Patents, More Litigation
The author, a trial attorney, describes his experience with a web-based platform designed for the analysis, review and production phases of e-discovery.
Read the Executive Summary »
With SEC and other government investigations becoming more common, companies should consider whether the cost of responding to them is covered by their directors and officers insurance.
Read the Executive Summary »
The authors review common alternative fee arrangements and their advantages, then describe the process by which law departments and outside counsel can work in partnership to facilitate such arrangements.
Read the Executive Summary »
At this annual event, held in Kansas City, Lathrop & Gage attorneys present snapshots of litigation trends in their respective areas, with an emphasis on regional developments.
Read the Executive Summary »
The potential for harsh sanctions for discovery missteps makes understanding the pitfalls of file copying and network data transfers a requirement in the digital age
Read the Executive Summary »
The author identifies a process called early case assessment (ECA) and traces its origins to a model that originated with the DuPont company in 1992.
Read the Executive Summary »
Even long-time government contractors can run afoul of affirmative action requirements, but they are especially likely to surprise a company that is new to the game or only rarely contracts with the federal government.
Read the Executive Summary »
The authors present a statistical case for their premise that CEOs are losing power to boards and institutional investors.
Read the Executive Summary »
The 2010 financial reform legislation includes a compensation recoupment, or “clawback” policy, for all publicly traded companies.
Read the Executive Summary »
A unified patent prosecution strategy is important because the consequences of inconsistent or contradictory patent prosecution strategies can be devastating.
Read the Executive Summary »
A key E-Discovery court opinion has been amended by the judge who wrote it, clarifying what the authors describe as a “significant internal conflict.”
Read the Executive Summary »
